
Yesterday Harris County District Attorney Pat Lykos announced that their office would no longer prosecute crack-pipe residue cases as felonies, but will issue a summons for a Class C drug paraphernalia case instead. The decision has prompted some criticism, but is long overdue. Anyone who works in the systems and gazes at this change in policy without agenda-clouded, political glasses knows that it makes sense from both sides.
From a law enforcement stand point, this change in policy will free up much need space in the Harris County jail. Most people charge in residue cases get short county jail sentences. Their stay in the county jail, although brief, contributes to overcrowding. The last few years, voters have SUSTAINED! opposition to proposals to increase taxes for the building of a new jail by rejecting them at the polls. The struggle to manage overcrowding at the county jail has led to the Sheriff shipping inmates as far as Louisiana and Texarkana while they await trial. This of course results in added expense to tax payers. Moreover, these case are riddled with proof issues. In addition to employing a chemist to engage in microscopic analysis (more analyis than a normal controlled substance case) to test the pipe to determine the presence of a controlled substance, law enforcement officers have the added burden of proving that the accused person knew that a pipe had residue in it and that they knew the residue was a controlled substance. The task of proving these cases occupies a felony prosecutor and a felony court which could otherwise be focusing on a homicide or other violent crime. In a time of scarce resources, Harris County is obligated to utilize its resources wisely.
From a defense standpoint, most of the people accused of crack pipe cases are non-violent drug users - who are generally in need of some form of rehabilitation. In Justice of the Peace (JP) court, where class C misdemeanors are prosecuted, Judges are able to send people to drug treatment. The District Attorney's Office handles the prosecution of these cases and can add the completition of any substance abuse treatment as a condition of any plea bargain. At the JP level, the cost of such treatment will be born by the person accused and not by the County. Furthermore, people who would not otherwise have a felony record would now avoid one. These people will be kept out of the cycle of getting a felony record and being denied employment and being pursuaded to commit crimes for economic reasons. Certainly, some people committ crimes to support drug habits, but prosecuting people for possession of drug paraphernalia as felons has done little to curb that. Additionally, after federal probes into treatment of inmates at the County jail found questionable practices and overcrowding issues. This decision may have the effect of easing some federal scrutiny.
It is politically risky for an elected official to make a decision which appears to take a soft stance on crime in Texas. Say what one wants about Pat Lykos.... but she had the guts to make a decision....a tough decision....one that was long overdue.
0 comments:
Post a Comment