Earlier this week, the Missouri Supreme Court overturned a death sentence because a defense attorney failed to question the character of a murder victim who had child pornography on his computer. In that case, the high court acknowledged in its unanimous ruling that character evidence about murder victims typically is barred, but when relatives of the victim testified about his generous character during the sentencing phase of the murder trial, defense attorneys should have countered by highlighting the pornography on the victim's computer. Had the defendant's attorneys done so, the Missouri Supreme Court said, jurors may have been less inclined to sentence him to death for the July 2002 kidnapping, robbery and shooting. The Supreme Court sent the case back to a lower court for a new sentencing hearing.
The reasoning of the Missouri Supreme Court was unconventional, but made sense. It was a scouring look at a death penalty case in an attempt to make sure the ultimate punishment of the government was correctly applied. Before we are quick to exact justice, it only makes sense to be certain of the result. The Innocence Project has proven that too many innocent people have been imprisoned for substantial periods of their lives. Everything weighs against being uncertain in criminal cases. Hasty judgment has allowed real criminals to remain free, while innocent people went to jail for their crimes. The truly guilt are allowed to remain free to commit more crime when we do not seek certainty in judicial results.
Appellate courts are not supposed to be rubber stamps. Appellate lawyers are not suppose to just get a brief on file. We are required to challenge our client's conviction in any manner possible. And where appropriate, we are required to challenge the bounds of the law and the constitution. Our advocacy should seek to extend the protections of the law and constitution to our clients. Unfortunately, this has not been the case in Texas. Our Court of Criminal Appeals (Texas' criminal Supreme Court) has long been a rubber stamp for the prosecution. The Court of Criminal Appeals rarely overturns death penalty convictions. And based on allegations against Judge Sharon Keller, the Court may have even obstructed efforts to insure the constitutionality of the death penalty. Well-based objections to the constitutionality of government actions to restrict liberty should always be SUSTAINED! No high court should be a rubber stamp. Until we undress the prosecutors who have been masquerading in black robes, we will forever shoulder the tears of the innocent who lost years of their lives from a wrongful conviction.
1 comments: