Thursday, September 15, 2011

SOOTHSAYERS


Convicted of Capital Murder and sentenced to Death,
Duane Buck is scheduled to die in Texas tonight
By:  Jacquelyn R. Carpenter


An "expert" witness took the stand and testified that a convicted killer's race was predictive of future violence.  I believe that I could stop writing here and the utter stupidity of that first sentence would ideologically still be read with the intended sarcasm.  


Nevertheless, all the "expert" witness managed to do was make a jury feel good about their decision to sentence a man to death.  Surprisingly, the court and all onlookers seemed to think it was appropriate to consider race to decide what someone was likely to do in the future.  Reading about Texas’ denial of a stay of execution for   Duane Buck causes me to think that we do not need character evidence anymore.  Let us just rely on a stereotype of someone to decide what that person is likely to do in the future.  Does that make Caucasians good candidates for theft since, well, let's face it, some predecessors stole land from the Indians?  Does that mean that if I have Irish in my blood, I am destined to commit a crime involving alcohol?  Are white people prone to be serial killers? 

As a matter of fact, if we can predict what people are going to do before they do it based on race, then we should rid America of problems before America even has problems.  How efficient would that be?  We can just send Hispanics to their respective motherland, African-Americans who have never been to Africa can be sent to Africa permanently.  Nevermind the fact that race does not decide citizenship.  Or, if sending people to a homeland they have never seen based on race seems too expensive, let's just figure out a way to justify killing them off?  Seems farfetched?  I'm exaggerating?  Well, that is exactly what is occurring: Texas has turned in their nooses for lethal injection.

We already know Texas unapologetically executes more people than any other state in the United States.  Governor Rick Perry is quite proud of it.  See recent debate statements where Perry says, "In the state of Texas, if you come into our state and you kill one of our children, you kill a police officer, you're involved with another crime and you kill one of our citizens, you will face the ultimate justice."  What, pray tell, is the “ultimate justice”?  Apparently, unconstitutionally valid executions!  Now, despite testimony that a man being Black is predictive of violent behavior, the State, against Duane Buck's constitutional right to a fair trial in all aspects of the proceeding (such as Sentencing), has denied a stay of execution.

This photo depicts the lynching of nineteen-year-old 
Elias Clayton, nineteen-year-old Elmer Jackson, 
and twenty-year-old Isaac McGhie.  June 15, 1920, 
in the Northern city, Duluth, Minnesota. 
Additionally, the treatment of Duane Buck is even more reprehensible because FIVE other cases flagged as having this same issue of racially inappropriate testimony have received new punishment hearings to correct the problem.  Yet, Duane Buck is being executed, put to death, endless sleep, "lawfully" murdered by the State without a redress of unconstitutional proportions.  To think for a second that so much as one juror considered Buck's race, Black/African-American, as a reason to justify his death, not only sickens me, but it is a slap in the face of our Forefathers, who envisioned and drafted the inalienable rights that are now being stripped from a protected member of our society.


So . . . where is the lynch mob?  I am Black . . . apparently that justifies my execution as well because, you know, we can predict future violence based on my race, which is the same as Duane Buck's.  I am reminded of the saying attributed to Martin Niemoller:

First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me,
and there was no one to speak out for me.

I understand that you may read this and think, "I'm not Black; it's not my fight."  But when will this be appalling?  What if some expert came along and said being of the insert your race here is predictive of future violence?  Would it be your fight then?  Perhaps blue eyes are deemed predictive of future violence?  Sound stupid?
Exactly.


ADDENDUM 10:30 PM SEPT. 15, 2011


The United States Supreme Court just blocked the execution of Duane Buck.  A link to the story can be found here.

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Only In Texas


By:  Eric J. Davis

During a trial in Tyler, Texas, a teen who appeared to be getting some "Texas-sized" Justice decided to show the Judge just what he thought of "his honor."  In open court, the teen pulled down his pants and peed in a trash can.  Unfortunately, the Judge did not question the competency of the teenager.  Nor did the Judge even hold the Child in contempt.  Surprisingly, the teen pled guilty and is set for sentencing before the same Judge on September 16, 2011.  Certainly this all does not seem like sane behavior.  What competent person would pee in court in front of a Judge, get scolded by that Judge for doing it and then give that same Judge an opportunity to sentence him up to life in prison for a violent crime?  Hopefully, challenges to the child's competency will be SUSTAINED!

Did you notice that the child's lawyer requested a competency examination and then pled him guilty?!?!??  How could he allow a client he thought was incompetent to enter a plea of guilty?  Usually Judges will inquire about a defendant's competency prior to accepting a guilty plea.  If a person is incompetent then there is a great likelihood that the person does not understand the nature of the proceedings and the rights they are relinquishing by entering a plea.  What happened in this case?  Did the Judge just ignore these obvious signs of mental impairment, in favor of his desire to send a message to the public and exact some "Texas-sized" justice?  Are the young man's rights so unimportant in Texas, that the Court quickly set sentencing less than a week away?  Is that sufficient time to conduct a presentence investigation (an investigation into the defendant's background - social, psychological, etc.)?  Or is this Tyler Judge doing what so many other courts do.... herding cattle?  If the cameras were not present in court, this certainly would never have happened.  Most small-town bailiffs would have been all over a defendant who walked out of place without instructions like this child did before he peed in court.  Sadly, this youth gave the media ammunition to villify him and others who are in his situation.  Mental illness does not equal disrespectfulness in most places in America.... only in Texas.

"I freed a thousand slaves I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."

- Harriet Tubman